December, 2006

Archive for

DVD, upscaled DVD, and HDTV

Today I performed a little test. I wanted to see how well a DVD upscaled to 1080i looked compared with a non-upscaled DVD, as well as compared with the same thing in true HD.

I took my Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers DVD, and loaded up The Two Towers in HD on demand through Comcast cable.

I played the movie on my Xbox 360 DVD player (480p), on my Philips upscaling DVD (480p upscaled to 1080i), and then the HD Comcast version (1080i).

Not surprisingly, the HD version was the most detailed, and the non-upscaled DVD was the least sharp.

Where my interest lied is where the upscaled DVD fell on this spectrum. Happily, it was closer to the HD picture than the non-upscaled DVD picture.

CNet warned that upscaling “doesn’t do miracles”, but I was pleased with the marked improvement in sharpness in the upscaled DVD picture. This was especially evident in the menu screen before the movie loaded, where one could view black text on a white-ish background, and really compare the sharpness. The upscaled DVD was much sharper than the non-upscaled DVD, and rivaled the HD picture.

During actual scenes, subtle detail appeared in the HD picture that did not appear (or at least was not as pronounced) in even the upscaled DVD image.

Granted, this test was not perfect – only the upscaling DVD player was connected via HDMI, the other two devices were connected via component. But HDMI doesn’t automatically mean a better picture, either.
It may not do “miracles”, but this little unscientific test made me glad that I got an upscaling DVD player. It’s impressive, and makes me wonder how necessary HD-DVD and Blu-Ray really are (certainly an improvement, but not one that’s going to have me replacing my old DVDs anytime soon – maybe NEXT format war)

HDMI cables for cheap

Got an HDTV? Then you probably have (or need) some HDMI cables. HDMI cables are the preferred means of connecting video equipment to HD-enabled display devices. They’re digital and offer the highest quality available.

Problem is, they’re expensive. Unnecessarily expensive. At Best Buy, they start from about $60 and go up from there.

A website called monoPrice.com, however, sells 6′ HDMI cables for about $5.

Five bucks? They have to be crap, right?

Nope. With digital signals, cable “quality” is less of an issue. But most importantly, there’s no reason for HDMI cables to cost $60-100 anyway. High-end video people are used to spending big on cables (which, in the analog days, WAS necessary for top quality), and so cable manufacturers are all too willing to mark cables up high, even if they don’t belong at that price.

The people at AVS Forums (a hardcore A/V crowd) love the monoPrice cables.

So, don’t get fooled into paying sky-high prices for HDMI or DVI cables. The markups above $10 are just pure profit.

Insight

Something new I have decided to do with this page is to post things I read online that I find to be insightful, or at least a concise bit of knowledge or opinion found in my travels through the internet ether. Some of them may be obvious to some people, but others may find something of interest in them.
This comes from Jun-Dai from the Criterion forums, on the topic of high-definition video disc (Blu-Ray, HD-DVD) adoption:

I’ll eat my hat if DVD isn’t the highest quality home video format in the US with more than 10% adoption for the next five years at least. The format war isn’t the biggest of the obstacles, but it’s definitely an obstacle. People simply aren’t ready for another format, and more importantly, the higher quality formats offer nothing over DVD other than quality, whereas DVD offered a good deal over the previous formats (in order of importance: small form factor, no degradation, improved video quality, easy access to favorite scenes/no rewinding, all DVD players play CDs, and special features).